Who Writes and Reviews SeeMyPersonality Content
SeeMyPersonality content is authored with a psychology-led, evidence-based framework. This page explains authorship, methodology, and the review standards used across tests, reports, and guidance pages.
Psychology-Led Assessment Expertise
Content on SeeMyPersonality is directed by Michael Hodge, including test design guidance, interpretation content, and quality standards for new assessments.
The approach combines formal psychology training at the University of Wollongong with hands-on expertise in questionnaire design, item writing, and practical psychometric review.
Michael Hodge
Founder, SeeMyPersonality
Studied psychology at UOW, with a focus on practical assessment design.
Extensive experience in questionnaire and survey design across educational and applied settings.
Practice areas include item quality, scoring design, interpretation frameworks, and drop-off diagnostics.
Principles Used Across SeeMyPersonality
These principles are applied to personality tests, scoring interpretation, and educational assessment content.
Outcome-first design
Every questionnaire starts with a clear construct and intended decision before items are drafted.
Fairness and accessibility
Items are reviewed for reading load, bias risk, mobile usability, and practical completion time.
Evidence-driven iteration
Pilots, item behavior, and drop-off diagnostics inform revisions before broad release.
Independent Review and Improvement Process
Each major questionnaire or guidance resource is developed and refined through a repeatable quality process.
Define construct and use case
Set audience, target construct, and what the result should help users understand or decide.
Build the item blueprint
Map constructs to item types, scoring logic, and interpretation guidance for complete coverage.
Draft and calibrate items
Write single-focus items, review wording quality, and tune scale anchors for clarity.
Run internal QA
Check branching, scoring math, edge cases, completion flow, and result narrative consistency.
Independent editorial pass
Review for fairness, readability, and whether claims match what the instrument can support.
Pilot, analyze, and version
Assess completion patterns and psychometric quality signals, then publish with tracked updates.
Where These Standards Are Applied
Authorship and review standards are used across both consumer and hiring-facing assessment content.
Questions About Methods or Authorship?
If you want details on a specific test methodology, item rationale, or review cycle, contact us and we will help.