SeeMyPersonality content is authored with a psychology-led, evidence-based framework. This page explains authorship, methodology, and the review standards used across tests, reports, and guidance pages.
Content on SeeMyPersonality is directed by Michael Hodge, including test design guidance, interpretation content, and quality standards for new assessments.
The approach combines formal psychology training at the University of Wollongong with hands-on expertise in questionnaire design, item writing, and practical psychometric review.
Michael Hodge
Founder, SeeMyPersonality
Bachelor of Science (Psychology), University of Wollongong, with coursework in psychometrics and research methods.
Extensive experience in questionnaire and survey design across educational and applied settings.
Practice areas include item quality, scoring design, norm referencing, scale construction, interpretation frameworks, and drop-off diagnostics.
| Area | Scope | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment Design & Review | All personality tests, scoring logic, instrument selection | Author & Reviewer |
| Content & Guides | MBTI guides, Big Five type profiles, educational articles | Author |
| Hiring & Workplace | Role-specific hiring guides, interview frameworks | Author & Reviewer |
These principles are applied to personality tests, scoring interpretation, and educational assessment content.
Every questionnaire starts with a clear construct and intended decision before items are drafted.
Items are reviewed for reading load, bias risk, mobile usability, and practical completion time.
Pilots, item behavior, and drop-off diagnostics inform revisions before broad release.
Each major questionnaire or guidance resource is developed and refined through a repeatable quality process.
Set audience, target construct, and what the result should help users understand or decide.
Map constructs to item types, scoring logic, and interpretation guidance for complete coverage.
Write single-focus items, review wording quality, and tune scale anchors for clarity.
Check branching, scoring math, edge cases, completion flow, and result narrative consistency.
Review for fairness, readability, and whether claims match what the instrument can support.
Assess completion patterns and psychometric quality signals, then publish with tracked updates.
Authorship and review standards are used across both consumer and hiring-facing assessment content.
If you want details on a specific test methodology, item rationale, or review cycle, contact us and we will help.