For hiring teams, managers & people leaders

Stop guessing about people.

Hire, build teams, and grow your people on real evidence — not instinct. Pick a goal and explore a live report below.

Hire the right person. Your whole pipeline, ranked by fit for the role. Switch the role and the same people re-rank — open anyone for their full report.

Sample Hiring Report

Sample

Sales Development Rep · High-Performance Sales Org · 20 respondents · ranked by fit. Click any respondent to open their full report.

NameFitDecisionStatusCompleted
1
Priya Menon

priya.menon@example.com

100Strong Alignment
ShortlistedCompletedApr 16, 2026
2
Sofia Haddad

sofia.haddad@example.com

100Strong Alignment
ShortlistedCompletedApr 16, 2026
3
Oliver Nguyen

oliver.nguyen@example.com

100Strong Alignment
NewCompletedApr 16, 2026
4
Diego Alvarez

diego.alvarez@example.com

88Strong Alignment
InterviewingCompletedApr 16, 2026
5
Fatima Zahra

fatima.zahra@example.com

75Promising — Explore Further
NewCompletedApr 16, 2026
6
Marcus Bell

marcus.bell@example.com

74Promising — Explore Further
NewCompletedApr 16, 2026
7
Liam O'Connor

liam.oconnor@example.com

73Promising — Explore Further
NewCompletedApr 16, 2026
8
Noah Schmidt

noah.schmidt@example.com

73Promising — Explore Further
NewCompletedApr 16, 2026
9
Ethan Wright

ethan.wright@example.com

72Promising — Explore Further
NewCompletedApr 16, 2026
10
Camila Rossi

camila.rossi@example.com

72Promising — Explore Further
NewCompletedApr 16, 2026
11
Yuki Tanaka

yuki.tanaka@example.com

70Promising — Explore Further
NewCompletedApr 16, 2026
12
Aisha Okafor

aisha.okafor@example.com

66Promising — Explore Further
NewCompletedApr 16, 2026
13
Grace Kimreview

grace.kim@example.com

63Promising — Explore Further
NewCompletedApr 16, 2026
14
Hana Petrova

hana.petrova@example.com

52Stretch Fit
NewCompletedApr 16, 2026
15
Jamal Carter

jamal.carter@example.com

50Stretch Fit
NewCompletedApr 16, 2026
16
Tomás Bautista

tomas.bautista@example.com

50Stretch Fit
NewCompletedApr 16, 2026
17
Sarah Lindqvist

sarah.lindqvist@example.com

49Stretch Fit
NewCompletedApr 16, 2026
18
Rina Gupta

rina.gupta@example.com

49Stretch Fit
NewCompletedApr 16, 2026
19
Kevin Brooks

kevin.brooks@example.com

30Limited Alignment
NewCompletedApr 16, 2026
20
Marta Nowakreview

marta.nowak@example.com

29Limited Alignment
NewCompletedApr 16, 2026

Switch the role above and the same 20 people re-rank by fit.

Sample respondents · every score computed live by the same engine your dashboard uses · no data of yours required

No credit card First assessment free Research-backed & transparent

Why evidence beats instinct

0%
of the time, companies put the wrong person in the role1
0%
of real job performance a gut-feel interview actually explains2
0×
better prediction than reviewing a résumé alone2
0+
cultures where the Big Five replicates3

1 Gallup · 2 Schmidt & Hunter (1998) · 3 McCrae & Costa. Full citations ↓

The honest problem

Your instinct is a coin-flip with extra steps.

A typical unstructured interview explains only about 14% of how someone will actually perform. Pair a role-mapped Big Five assessment with a structured interview and you roughly quadruple that — the strongest evidence-based way to hire.

This isn't about replacing judgment with a number. It's about giving your judgment better evidence: what a person is like to work with, where they'll stretch, and exactly what to probe before you decide.

What the research actually says

  • Structured assessment + interview predicts performance far better than either alone.
  • A score should sharpen the next conversation — never silently reject a person.
  • Map traits to the real job, then verify them in the interview.

How well each method predicts on-the-job performance (predictive validity, r×100)

Big Five + structured interview — 63
Cognitive ability — 51
Structured interview — 51
Conscientiousness alone — 31
Years of job experience — 18
A résumé / work history — 14

Schmidt & Hunter (1998), 85-year meta-analysis. The relative ranking is uncontested; absolute values were corrected downward in later re-analyses.

One assessment, the whole picture

Everything one assessment reveals

You saw it live above. Every respondent produces the same rounded read — for hiring, for team-building, or for development — computed the moment they finish, no analyst required.

Big Five, in real depth

Five domains and 30 facets, each scored to a normative percentile. The stable work tendencies a CV can never show.

Role fit, scored to the job

Every candidate measured against the role you defined, with a transparent 0–100 score and visible weights — no black box.

Culture fit, eight dimensions

Where a person aligns with how your team really works — and where the tension is worth an honest conversation.

Six deep reports

Leadership, conflict, resilience, sales, strengths, and culture — a rounded read, not a one-line label.

Interview questions to the gaps

Behavioural questions with 1–5 scoring anchors, tailored to this person. Your panel walks in aligned, not winging it.

Response-quality flags

Rushed or inconsistent answers are surfaced, not hidden — so you know when to treat a score as directional.

Truth before theater

Built on the science, not a personality horoscope

The Big Five is the model with the strongest evidence base in workplace research. Here's a fraction of it.

As strong as IQ or wealth

Across decades of longitudinal studies, personality traits predicted life outcomes — career success, relationships, longevity — about as powerfully as socioeconomic status or cognitive ability.

Roberts, Kuncel, Shiner, Caspi & Goldberg (2007), The Power of Personality

Predicts performance in every job

In the meta-analysis that established trait-based hiring, Conscientiousness predicted job performance across effectively every occupation studied — the one trait that generalises everywhere.

Barrick & Mount (1991), Personnel Psychology

Replicates across 50+ cultures

The same five-factor structure recovers in more than fifty cultures, including languages with no shared history — one of the most replicated findings in personality science.

McCrae & Costa; McCrae & Terracciano (2005)

One input, not the whole person. Personality informs a hiring decision — it never defines it. We surface signal for the conversation; the judgment stays yours.

What fit is worth

Get fit right and the whole team feels it.

Gallup's meta-analysis of 3.35 million employees compared the most- and least-engaged teams. Hiring and developing for genuine fit is how you land on the right side of these numbers.

0%
lower absenteeism on the most-engaged teams
0%
lower turnover in low-turnover organisations
0%
higher profitability, top vs bottom quartile
0%
of the variance in engagement traces to the manager

Gallup Q12 Meta-Analysis, 11th Edition (2024), top- vs bottom-quartile engagement · manager-variance figure from Gallup (2015).

How it works

From a job description to a confident hire

1

Define the role

Paste the job description you already have. We draft a role profile with transparent trait weights — you approve them before anyone answers a question.

2

Invite respondents

A branded, mobile-friendly link — about 10 minutes, no candidate account. Your whole pipeline completes on their own time.

3

Rank, interview, onboard

Open the ranked shortlist, the fit reports, and the tailored interview guide — then keep the same evidence for a 30/60/90 onboarding plan.

Run this on your own candidates — free.

You just explored real reports with sample data. Your first assessment on real candidates is free — no card, no setup, no catch.

Research-backed
GDPR ready
256-bit encrypted

See who actually fits. Your first assessment is free.

Start free