How to Hire Call Center Agents: Personality Traits, Interview Questions and Assessment
Cut call center turnover with data. Which traits predict agent retention, behavioral interview questions with rubrics, and a free pre-hire assessment workflow.
Preview an interview kit
The Real Challenge of Hiring Call Center Agents
Hiring call center agents today feels like trying to fill a sieve—attrition in U.S. contact centers runs between 30–45% annually, and first-year churn spikes to 65–70% in high-stress verticals like finance and healthcare (InsigniaResource, 2024). Each mis-hire costs between $10,000 and $20,000 when you factor in recruiting, training, and lost productivity. In a 100-seat center, that adds up to over $2 million per year in turnover costs alone. Meanwhile, time-to-productivity is painfully slow: classroom instruction plus nesting runs 6–12 weeks, yet full proficiency often doesn’t arrive until 8–10 months—nearly the average tenure of an agent (ProcedureFlow, 2023). Recruiters are swamped by hundreds of applicants but see only a trickle of truly qualified candidates, struggle with shift scheduling constraints, and face candidate ghosting late in the process.\n\n Traditional, unstructured interviews only predict about 14% of performance variance (r≈.38), leaving most of the risk unaddressed. When you combine structured interviews with objective personality or cognitive assessments, validity jumps to r≈.63 (Schmidt & Hunter, 1998). Yet many centers still hire by “gut fit,” welcoming likeability bias and overlooking critical predictors of retention and performance. This guide helps you replace luck with data-driven rigor so you can cut turnover, accelerate productivity, and build a more stable agent workforce.
Personality Traits That Predict Call Center Agent Success
High Conscientiousness (ρ≈.22)
Conscientious agents reliably follow scripts, hit QA benchmarks, and complete after-call work accurately. In telecom studies, agents scoring one standard deviation above the mean on conscientiousness averaged 7% shorter handle times (DOAJ, 2021), directly impacting service efficiency. This trait also correlates with punctuality and adherence to shift schedules, reducing absenteeism. Prioritizing conscientiousness in your call center personality assessment can therefore lower operational costs and improve process compliance.
Moderate–High Agreeableness (ρ≈.13)
Agreeable agents excel at empathy and de-escalating frustrated callers, driving higher CSAT scores. Meta-analyses show a correlation around .13 between agreeableness and job performance in service roles (Wilmot & Ones, 2022). However, extremely high agreeableness may undermine boundary-setting—agents might over-promise or avoid policy enforcement to keep customers happy. Aim for moderate-high levels to balance warmth with assertiveness.
Moderate Extraversion (ρ≈.14)
Extraverted agents sustain positive energy and verbal fluency across back-to-back calls, helping meet volume quotas without sounding robotic. Barrick & Mount (1991) cite a .14 correlation between extraversion and performance in customer-facing roles. Too little extraversion can lead to monotone interactions; too much may overwhelm quieter customers or lead to off-script chatter. Seek a balance that maintains engagement while keeping calls efficient.
Low Neuroticism / High Emotional Stability (ρ≈.12)
Agents with low neuroticism remain calm under pressure, recovering quickly from irate callers and stressful shifts. One call center study found emotional stability predicted performance (β=.12) and significantly reduced quit intentions (DOAJ, 2021). High emotional stability also correlates with lower burnout rates, extending tenure. Including this trait in your assessment flags candidates likely to endure the pressure of high-volume service environments.
Mid-Range Openness (ρ≈.04)
Openness supports rapid learning when scripts or product lines change—agents with mid-range scores adapt without boredom. Barrick & Mount (1991) report a modest .04 correlation with performance, but extremes in either direction can be problematic. Very high openness may lead to distraction from routine tasks, while very low scores hamper flexibility. Targeting moderate openness ensures agents can handle evolving processes without losing focus.
What the Research Actually Shows
Decades of meta-analysis consistently demonstrate that structured assessment drives better hiring outcomes than informal methods. Schmidt & Hunter’s landmark 1998 review found that unstructured interviews predict only about .38 of performance variance (r=.38), whereas structured interviews alone hit r≈.51. When you layer in an objective measure—such as a Big Five personality assessment or a cognitive test—the combined validity rises to r≈.63, nearly doubling the predictive power compared to gut-feel interviews. That incremental validity translates to fewer mis-hires, reduced onboarding costs, and lower turnover, especially in high-stress roles like call center agents.\n\n In parallel, personality science shows that the Big Five traits each capture unique variance in key job outcomes. Conscientiousness alone accounts for roughly 5% of performance variance (ρ≈.22), while emotional stability, agreeableness, extraversion, and openness add between 1–2% each. Though 10–12% may sound modest, this is comparable to many technical skills tests and adds unique insights into turnover risk—something purely skills-based assessments miss. By integrating structured interviews with a short, validated call center personality assessment, you weave together metrics that predict both performance and retention.
Structured Assessments Deliver Better Predictive Power
A meta-analysis by Schmidt & Hunter (1998) found that combining structured interviews with cognitive or personality tests yields a validity coefficient of r≈.63, compared to r≈.38 for unstructured interviews alone. This 65% lift in predictive power can slash mis-hire rates and reduce annual turnover costs by hundreds of thousands of dollars in a mid-size call center.
Interview Questions That Actually Predict Performance
Not all interview questions are created equal. Behavioral questions—those that ask candidates to recount past experiences—map directly to the underlying traits that drive call center success, such as conscientiousness and emotional stability. By standardizing prompts, probes, and scoring anchors, you eliminate likeability bias and ensure every candidate is evaluated against the same yardstick.\n\n When you align each question with a Big Five trait and provide clear red-flag and benchmark indicators, hiring managers can quickly differentiate strong performers from high-risk candidates. The next section gives you eight vetted behavioral questions, along with what to listen for, red-flag signals, and score anchors to guide your decision making.
Behavioral Interview Questions with Scoring Guidance
Tell me about a time you had to juggle high after-call work while new calls kept queuing. How did you stay compliant without hurting wait times?
Strong candidates detail specific systems—checklists, macros, or time-blocking strategies—and cite metrics, such as maintaining QA scores above 95% or reducing average handle time by a set percentage. They explain how they tracked progress in real time and adjusted priorities when volume spiked. Red flags include vague assertions like “I just got it done,” blaming workload or technology, or failure to mention measurable outcomes. This question targets conscientiousness and process orientation.
Describe the last quality-audit error you received. What did you do next?
High scorers own the mistake, outline a specific corrective action plan—updating documentation, retraining peers, conducting a follow-up check—and share the results of that follow-up. They demonstrate learning and continuous improvement. Watch out for candidates who immediately blame the auditor or external factors, or who can’t describe any systematic change. This probes conscientiousness and accountability.
Give an example of turning an upset caller into a promoter.
Strong answers highlight empathy techniques—active listening, paraphrasing, and validating feelings—followed by a tangible solution that boosted CSAT or net promoter score. They quantify the impact (for instance, a 20% increase in survey scores) and explain any policy navigation required. A red flag is a generic apology or immediate escalation without attempted resolution. This question maps to agreeableness and customer focus.
Tell me about a time you had to refuse an unreasonable customer request.
Ideal responses demonstrate polite firmness: candidates reference company policy, offer alternative solutions, and maintain professionalism. They may note, “I explained the policy, apologized for the inconvenience, then suggested option X, which the customer accepted.” Beware responses that default to compliance or immediate transfer without negotiation. This tests agreeableness and boundary-setting.
How do you keep your energy up during back-to-back difficult calls?
Strong candidates share specific self-care tactics: brief mental resets, peer check-ins, micro-break breathing exercises, or motivational self-talk scripts. They tie those tactics back to maintaining KPIs and emotional composure. A red flag is reliance solely on stimulants like coffee or generic “stay positive” remarks with no concrete routine. This assesses extraversion and emotional stability.
Walk me through how you build rapport in the first 30 seconds of a call.
High scorers articulate a three-step opener: greeting by name, mirroring tone, and setting an agenda. They explain how this reduces hold times and sets customer expectations. Watch for rote script recitation without personalization or acknowledgment of customer cues. This targets extraversion and interpersonal agility.
Recall your most stressful shift. What signals told you stress was rising and how did you respond?
Strong responses identify physiological or emotional cues—racing heart, shallow breathing—and describe coping strategies such as pausing for two deep breaths or requesting a brief break. They demonstrate awareness of stress triggers and ability to maintain service levels. Beware candidates who claim never to feel stress or recount an uncontrolled outburst. This question probes emotional stability.
Share a time you had to learn a new product overnight and handle live questions.
Ideal answers outline a structured learning approach—reviewing knowledge bases, shadowing experienced peers, creating quick-reference guides—and quantify outcomes, such as resolution rates or customer satisfaction improvements. Red flags include statements like “I just winged it” or relying entirely on the supervisor. This assesses openness and learning agility.
Building Your Assessment Workflow
An efficient hiring process for call center agents weaves together automated screens, personality checks, and structured interviews to balance speed with rigor. Begin with a brief, validated call center personality assessment—no more than 10 Big Five items plus basic cognitive questions—to flag candidates who display the right conscientiousness, emotional stability, and agreeableness. Tools like SeeMyPersonality can integrate with your ATS to automatically score and rank applicants on these traits, but the key principle is consistency: every applicant completes the same workflow.\n\n Next, layer in an auto-knockout stage for legal minima—eligibility, language fluency, and scheduling availability—so your talent team only advances candidates who meet non-negotiable requirements. Follow up with a short asynchronous video interview focused on 3–4 role-specific prompts, with scoring rubrics that map back to your trait priorities. Finally, conduct a live, panel-based structured interview using the behavioral questions above.\n\n Consolidate data from each stage into a single scorecard where assessments account for 40%, interview performance 40%, and relevant experience 20%. Calibrate your cut-scores quarterly against QA and CSAT outcomes to keep attrition down. This multi-stage workflow ensures high volume without sacrificing predictive validity.
Step-by-Step Hiring Process
1. Automated High-Volume Assessment
Deploy a brief online assessment of basic cognitive skills and a 10-item Big Five survey to rank candidates on conscientiousness, agreeableness, and emotional stability. This stage processes hundreds of applications within minutes, immediately filtering out high-risk profiles prone to early quitting.
2. Auto-Knockout Screening
Implement automated checks for legal eligibility, language proficiency, and shift availability to eliminate applicants who cannot meet baseline requirements. This step reduces manual screening time and ensures compliance with internal policies.
3. Asynchronous Video Interview
Invite candidates to record responses to 3 scored prompts that probe role-critical competencies and personality indicators. Use structured scoring rubrics so recruiters can compare apples to apples across every candidate.
4. Live Structured Interview
Conduct a panel interview using the eight behavioral questions outlined above, with predefined red-flag and benchmark anchors. This ensures consistency and mitigates interviewer bias.
5. Consolidated Scorecard and Calibration
Combine assessment scores (40%), interview ratings (40%), and relevant experience (20%) into a unified scorecard. Review cut-scores against QA, AHT, and CSAT data quarterly to refine your model and continually reduce turnover.
Key Call Center Hiring Metrics
Common Hiring Mistakes (and How to Avoid Them)
Many organizations default to unstructured “get to know you” interviews, relying on gut feelings rather than data. This approach underpredicts performance by 13% compared to structured formats (Schmidt & Hunter, 1998) and overlooks key retention drivers. To avoid this mistake, implement a structured behavioral interview guide tied directly to your call center persona and job analysis.\n\n Another frequent error is skipping personality or situational judgment tests because “anyone can answer phones.” Yet a 12-minute call center personality assessment can flag up to 40% of likely early quitters before they ever reach the interview stage, saving roughly $300k annually in avoidable churn (Zipdo, 2024). Overweighting voice quality is also misleading—pleasant tone accounts for only 3–5% of CSAT variance, whereas adherence and accuracy drive the bulk of customer satisfaction. Finally, resist one-and-done decisions when your training class size is at stake. Gate each stage—assessment, video screen, live interview—to keep hiring both fast and accurate.
Mistakes to Watch For
Relying on Unstructured Interviews
When interviewers wander off-script, decisions rest on charisma and gut feelings. This introduces likeability bias and misses objective signals of performance and retention risk. Structured questions and scoring anchors eliminate these biases and boost predictive validity by nearly 30%.
Skipping Personality Assessments
Dismissing a short Big Five assessment because “anyone can pick up a phone” leads to high churn. A brief personality check can flag nearly half of likely early-quitters, cutting replacement costs dramatically. Integrate it early to save time and budget.
Over-Emphasizing Voice Quality
Pleasant tone is easy to spot, but it explains only 3–5% of customer satisfaction variance. Focusing on vocal qualities neglects critical predictors like conscientiousness and emotional stability. Balance voice samples with objective trait and skills measures.
Making One-And-Done Decisions
Accepting a final candidate slate based on a 15-minute review to fill a training class invites mis-hires. Stagger assessments, video screens, and live interviews to distribute hiring volume and maintain rigor. This multi-stage model reduces knee-jerk offers and turnover.
After the Hire: Setting Up for Success
Onboarding shouldn’t stop at paperwork. Use personality assessment results to tailor coaching—pair highly conscientious new hires with mentors who model efficient workflows, and offer emotional-stability training (stress-management techniques) for those with moderate scores. Create individualized development plans that leverage each agent’s strengths and address potential risk areas identified in their Big Five profile.\n\n Schedule check-ins at 30-, 60-, and 90-day marks to review QA scores, AHT trends, and CSAT feedback in light of personality insights. This data-backed approach not only accelerates proficiency but also signals to agents that your organization invests in their success, further boosting retention.
Frequently Asked Questions
Find answers to common questions
Big Five measures typically show minimal subgroup differences compared to cognitive tests. To ensure fairness, validate your assessment locally by comparing hire rates across demographic groups and monitoring impact ratios. Adjust cut-scores only if you identify significant disparities, and document the process for legal defensibility.
Data shows candidate completion rates remain above 85% for assessments under 15 minutes. A best practice is to combine a 10-item Big Five survey, a 6-item situational judgment test, and a quick two-minute typing or voice-sample exercise. Keep each section concise and clearly labeled to maintain engagement.
While automation accelerates screening, fully replacing human interviews isn’t recommended. Structured human interviews capture nuance—tone, rapport, follow-up questions—and help set realistic job expectations. Use automation for volume screening, but reserve structured interviews for your final candidate pool.
Prior call center tenure is a useful tie-breaker but poorly predicts long-term performance or retention on its own. Limit experience weighting to around 15–20% of your total score so it informs without dominating. Focus the bulk of your evaluation on validated assessments and structured interviews.
Best practice is to review and re-validate your assessment model every 6–12 months or after major changes in products, scripts, or KPIs. Analyze correlations between assessment scores, QA results, and turnover data to adjust weightings and cut-scores. This continuous loop keeps your process aligned with evolving business needs.
Remote environments benefit from slightly higher conscientiousness—self-discipline is critical when unsupervised—and slightly lower extraversion, since social energy drains faster online. However, core traits like emotional stability and agreeableness remain equally important. Use the same structured workflow and adjust cut-scores to reflect these slight shifts.
Aim for same-day offers once final structured interviews conclude to reduce renege rates by up to 18% in high-volume hiring (Internal Benchmark, 2023). Make clear in advance that top candidates will receive swift decisions, which also builds goodwill and reinforces your brand. Robust prior assessments ensure quality isn’t sacrificed for speed.
Yes—studies show conscientiousness (ρ≈.22) and openness (ρ≈.16) correlate with faster mastery of training curricula (Barrick & Mount, 1991). By identifying candidates strong on these traits early, you’ll see fewer training drop-outs and a shorter time-to-proficiency. Incorporate those insights into your onboarding plans to maximize return on training investment.
Related Resources
Explore more on this topic
For Employers
Use personality assessments for hiring
Run the same research-backed assessments on job candidates. Get personality profiles, structured interview guides, and data-driven hiring insights.
Ready to Transform Your Hiring?
Use scientifically validated personality assessments to make better hiring decisions.